Back
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Ashok Narayan Prasad, S/o. Late Gyan Chandra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This petition has been taken up through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.
2. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned senior assisted by Mr. Lal Vikram Nath Shahdeo, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, learned counsel for the State.
3. The present petition has been filed for quashing of F.I.R. in connection with Chas P.S. Case No. 222/2019 dated 29.07.2019 registered under sections 406/420/323/504/506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro.
4. The Complaint Case No. 399 of 2014 was filed in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro on 17.07.2014 alleging therein that all the three accused persons including petitioner who are officials of Basil International Limited Branch, Solagdih came to his residence and put forward a lucrative offer and assured him to invest his money in his company for better financial growth and on their assurance, the complainant
The necessity of filing an affidavit before a petition under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. and the exercise of discretion by the Magistrate guided by the interest of justice in deciding whether to di....
The court emphasized that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be sparingly exercised and that the court should not interfere with the investigation unless no cognizable offence is disclosed. I....
The court cannot inquire into the reliability or genuineness of the allegations made in the FIR when considering quashing.
Compliance with specific guidelines for FIR registration as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court is essential, and the court may quash an FIR if it is found to be an abuse of process of law and in ....
The court emphasized that quashing of criminal proceedings should be an exception rather than a rule, and should only be done in exceptional cases where non-interference would result in a miscarriage....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
