SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 853

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, Rajesh Kumar, JJ.
Mahesh Agarwal, S/o. Late Mahadeo Prasad Agarwal - Appellant
Versus
Union of India through National Investigation Agency - Respondent
Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 175 of 2022
Decided On : 11-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Vikash Pahwa, Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Mr. Nitesh Rana.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASGI, Mr. Amit Kr. Das.

Headnote:

The appellant, Managing Director of Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Limited, was arrested and charged with terror funding and other offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAP Act). The appellant challenged the denial of bail by the trial court, arguing that the allegations against him were baseless and that he was a victim of extortion by the terrorist organization TPC. The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against the appellant were prima facie true.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, Managing Director of Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Limited, was arrested and charged with terror funding and other offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAP Act). The appellant challenged the denial of bail by the trial court, arguing that the allegations against him were baseless and that he was a victim of extortion by the terrorist organization TPC.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against the appellant were prima facie true.

Issues: Whether the appellant was involved in terror funding and other offenses under the UAP Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The High Court held that the allegations against the appellant were not supported by sufficient evidence and that there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against him were prima facie true. The court noted that the appellant was a victim of extortion by the terrorist organization TPC and that he had made payments to the organization in order to protect his business.

Final Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal and granted bail to the appellant.

JUDGMENT :

[R. Mukhopadhyay. J.]

1. Heard Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Mr. Vikash Pahwa, learned Senior Counsels appearing for the appellant and Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned ASGI for the National Investigation Agency.

2. Aggrieved by the order dated 26.02.2022 passed by the learned AJC-XVI-cum-Spl. Judge, NIA, Ranchi in Misc. Criminal Application No. 109/2022, corresponding to Special (NIA) Case No. 03 of 2018 (R.C. Case No. 06/2018/NIA/DLI), arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016, by which the prayer for bail of the appellant was rejected, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.

3. A written report was submitted by Ramdhari Singh, Sub Inspector of Police, posted at Simaria P.S. to the effect that on 10.01.2016 a secret information was received by the Superintendent of Police that in Amrapali Magadh Coal area in Tandwa some local people have formed an association which is related to the banned extremist outfit TPC. The members of such association were extracting levy from coal traders and DO holders by creating fear in the name of the extremists of TPC, namely Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohram Ji, Akraman Ji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischay Ganjhu, Bhikan Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan and Bindu Ghanju. It was also alleged that if any businessmen hesitates to pay levy, they are threatened by members of such organization and are also subjected to hardships. In order to verify the truthfulness or otherwise of such information a raiding party was constituted on the orders of Superintendent of Police, Chatra. A raid was conducted in the house of the President of the association Binod Kumar Ganjhu and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 91,75,890/- was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be submitted by Binod Kumar Ganjhu with respect to the recovery of such a huge amount of cash. From the house of Binod Kumar Ganjhu two persons were also apprehended who disclosed their names as Birbal Ganjhu and Munesh Ganjhu and on search of their persons a loaded Mauser pistol was recovered from the possession of Birbal Ganjhu while from the possession of Munesh Ganjhu a country made pistol and two live cartridges were recovered. Both had confessed of being associated with TPC organization. Binod Ganjhu had disclosed that he is the President of “Magadh Sanchalan Samittee” and the levy collected is sent to Gopal Singh Bhogta @ Brijesh Ganjhu and thereafter it is distributed between Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischyaji, Bhikan Ganjhu and Deepu Singh @ Bhikan. He had further disclosed that Bindu Ganjhu is a member of “Amrapali Sanchalan Samittee” who collects levy on behalf of TPC and since he is at present in Jail the collection of levy is being done by Pradeep Ram. On such information a raid was conducted in the house of Pradeep Ram and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 57,57,710/- in cash was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be given by Pradeep Ram with respect to the cash recovered.

4. Based on the aforesaid allegations Tandwa P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 was instituted for the offences under Sections 414, 384, 386, 387, 120B of the I.P.C., Section 25(1-b)(a), 26/35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 (1)(2) of Criminal Law Amendment Act against Binod Kumar Ganjhu, Munesh Ganjhu, Pradeep Ram, Birbal Ganjhu, Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischya Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan, Bindu Ganjhu @ Bindeshwar Ganjhu and Bhikan Ganjhu.

On 10.03.2016 charge sheet was submitted against the other accused persons before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. On 09.04.2017 on the prayer made by the Investigating Officer offences under Sections 16, 17, 20 and 23 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (herein after referred to as the UAP Act for the sake of brevity) were added. Since the offences involved a scheduled offence, in exercise of powers conferred u/s 6(3) read with Se

                                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                            1
                                            2
                                            3
                                            4
                                            5
                                            6
                                            7
                                            8
                                            9
                                            10
                                            11
                                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                            supreme today icon
                                            logo-black

                                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                            Please visit our Training & Support
                                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                            qr

                                            Scan Me!

                                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                            whatsapp-icon Back to top