IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, Rajesh Kumar, JJ.
Mahesh Agarwal, S/o. Late Mahadeo Prasad Agarwal - Appellant
Versus
Union of India through National Investigation Agency - Respondent
Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 175 of 2022
Decided On : 11-04-2022
The appellant, Managing Director of Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Limited, was arrested and charged with terror funding and other offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAP Act). The appellant challenged the denial of bail by the trial court, arguing that the allegations against him were baseless and that he was a victim of extortion by the terrorist organization TPC. The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against the appellant were prima facie true.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, Managing Director of Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Limited, was arrested and charged with terror funding and other offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAP Act). The appellant challenged the denial of bail by the trial court, arguing that the allegations against him were baseless and that he was a victim of extortion by the terrorist organization TPC.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against the appellant were prima facie true.
Issues: Whether the appellant was involved in terror funding and other offenses under the UAP Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The High Court held that the allegations against the appellant were not supported by sufficient evidence and that there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against him were prima facie true. The court noted that the appellant was a victim of extortion by the terrorist organization TPC and that he had made payments to the organization in order to protect his business.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal and granted bail to the appellant.
JUDGMENT :
[R. Mukhopadhyay. J.]
1. Heard Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Mr. Vikash Pahwa, learned Senior Counsels appearing for the appellant and Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned ASGI for the National Investigation Agency.
2. Aggrieved by the order dated 26.02.2022 passed by the learned AJC-XVI-cum-Spl. Judge, NIA, Ranchi in Misc. Criminal Application No. 109/2022, corresponding to Special (NIA) Case No. 03 of 2018 (R.C. Case No. 06/2018/NIA/DLI), arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016, by which the prayer for bail of the appellant was rejected, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.
3. A written report was submitted by Ramdhari Singh, Sub Inspector of Police, posted at Simaria P.S. to the effect that on 10.01.2016 a secret information was received by the Superintendent of Police that in Amrapali Magadh Coal area in Tandwa some local people have formed an association which is related to the banned extremist outfit TPC. The members of such association were extracting levy from coal traders and DO holders by creating fear in the name of the extremists of TPC, namely Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohram Ji, Akraman Ji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischay Ganjhu, Bhikan Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan and Bindu Ghanju. It was also alleged that if any businessmen hesitates to pay levy, they are threatened by members of such organization and are also subjected to hardships. In order to verify the truthfulness or otherwise of such information a raiding party was constituted on the orders of Superintendent of Police, Chatra. A raid was conducted in the house of the President of the association Binod Kumar Ganjhu and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 91,75,890/- was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be submitted by Binod Kumar Ganjhu with respect to the recovery of such a huge amount of cash. From the house of Binod Kumar Ganjhu two persons were also apprehended who disclosed their names as Birbal Ganjhu and Munesh Ganjhu and on search of their persons a loaded Mauser pistol was recovered from the possession of Birbal Ganjhu while from the possession of Munesh Ganjhu a country made pistol and two live cartridges were recovered. Both had confessed of being associated with TPC organization. Binod Ganjhu had disclosed that he is the President of “Magadh Sanchalan Samittee” and the levy collected is sent to Gopal Singh Bhogta @ Brijesh Ganjhu and thereafter it is distributed between Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischyaji, Bhikan Ganjhu and Deepu Singh @ Bhikan. He had further disclosed that Bindu Ganjhu is a member of “Amrapali Sanchalan Samittee” who collects levy on behalf of TPC and since he is at present in Jail the collection of levy is being done by Pradeep Ram. On such information a raid was conducted in the house of Pradeep Ram and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 57,57,710/- in cash was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be given by Pradeep Ram with respect to the cash recovered.
4. Based on the aforesaid allegations Tandwa P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 was instituted for the offences under Sections 414, 384, 386, 387, 120B of the I.P.C., Section 25(1-b)(a), 26/35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 (1)(2) of Criminal Law Amendment Act against Binod Kumar Ganjhu, Munesh Ganjhu, Pradeep Ram, Birbal Ganjhu, Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischya Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan, Bindu Ganjhu @ Bindeshwar Ganjhu and Bhikan Ganjhu.
On 10.03.2016 charge sheet was submitted against the other accused persons before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. On 09.04.2017 on the prayer made by the Investigating Officer offences under Sections 16, 17, 20 and 23 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (herein after referred to as the UAP Act for the sake of brevity) were added. Since the offences involved a scheduled offence, in exercise of powers conferred u/s 6(3) read with Se
P. Chidambaram versus Directorate of Enforcement
Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya & Ors. versus The State of Gujarat & Anr.
Kamaljit Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr.
NIA versus Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
Bail application – Task to convince court that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that accusations are prima facie true becomes more onerous in a case of bail without ousting such prayer, ....
The NIA has the power to investigate cases under the NIA Act, and the court must consider the prima facie case against the accused, the length of custody, and the likelihood of trial conclusion when ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the payment of extortion money does not necessarily amount to terror funding, and the court must assess the prima facie truth of the accusatio....
The court established that statutory bail restrictions under the UAPA must be balanced with constitutional rights, particularly the right to a speedy trial, and that prolonged detention without trial....
The judgment underscores the principle that prolonged pre-trial detention without substantial evidence of involvement in terrorist activities can infringe upon constitutional rights, warranting the g....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.