Binod Soren vs State of Jharkhand - 2022 Supreme(Jhk) 930

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 930

NAVNEET KUMAR
Binod Soren – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. R.C.P. Sah.
For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Sukla, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

This appeal is preferred against the Judgment of Conviction and order of sentence dated 05.02.2003, passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, FTC-IV, Bokaro, in S.T. No.247 of 1997, arising out of Chandankiyari P.S. Case No.78 of 1996, corresponding to G.R. No.1457 of 1996, whereby and where under the accused appellants have been convicted for the offence under Sections 148/323/149 of IPC and sentenced to undergo one year S.I. under section 148 of IPC, and one year S.I. under section 323 of IPC. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. The allegations against the appellants arose in the wake of the fardbeyan of informant Sonamani Manjhian recorded by S.I. Arvind Kumar Sinha I/C Amlabad O.P. (P.S.-Chandankiyari) on 24.11.1996 at 09.00 hours at village Harai Kurwa, district-Bokaro is that-

On 23.11.1996, informant along with her daughters Robari Manjhian, Dhobani Manjhian, Surubali Manjhian and son-in-law Sohrai Manhi and Ramlal Manjhi were harvesting her paddy crops in her paddy field situated at Mahal Tola Gahira. In the evening when they were collecting the paddy crops at about 6 pm, Budheshwar Manjhi, Polen Manjhi, Shiva Manjhi, Binod Soren a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document