SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Anurag Kumar, S/o. Sri Gopal Krishna Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioners in Cr. M.P. Nos.326 of 2015 and 2624 of 2014 and Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned Senior counsel along with Mr. Nishant Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner in Cr. M.P. No.2894 of 2014, Mr. Md. Hatim, Mr. V.S. Sahay and Mrs. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.Ps. for the State and Mr. Prasant Pallav, learned A.S.G.I. for opposite party no.2.
2. In all these petitions, common question of facts and laws are involved and that is why all these petitions have been heard together with the consent of the parties.
3. In Cr. M.P. No.326 of 2015, petitioner no.1 is the General Manager of B&K Area of Central Coalfields Limited and petitioner no.2 is the Project Officer of the Central Coalfields Limited, in Cr. M.P. No.2624 of 2014, the petitioner is the Director (Technical) of the Central Coalfields Limited and in Cr. M.P. No.2894 of 2014, the petitioner Krishna Kamal Gangopadhyay is representing M/s. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited.
4. In all these petitions, the prayer is made for quashing the entire criminal prosecution arising out of G. Case No.09/14 corresponding to TR No.2561 of 2014 including the order dated
State of Madras v. C.V. Parekh and Another
Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels and Tours Private Limited
Anil Gupta v. Star India Private Limited and Another
Sharad Kumar Sanghi v. Sangita Rane
Himanshu v. B. Shivamurthy and Another
Swapan Ganguly v. Union of India
A.K. Sahay v. The State of Jharkhand & another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.