SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 985

KAILASH PRASAD DEO
Kamal Ram Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhnd – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K. Sahani.

ORDER :

1. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. A. K. Shahani.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 19.12.2013 passed by learned Sub-Judge-IV, Ranchi in Title Suit No.90/2009, whereby the petition dated 08.08.2011 filed under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 C.P.C. by the intervener, Ajit kumar has been allowed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that plaintiffs have filed Title Suit No.90/2009, claiming the piece of land appertaining to R.S. Plot No.507 and 518 under Khata No.79 measuring an area 1.96 acres and 0.43 acres respectively and Plot No. 776 under Khata No.26 measuring an area 0.33 acres situated at Village-Tiril, P.S.-Sadar, Thana No.195, District-Ranchi, against the State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi and Circle Officer, Town Anchal Ranchi. During pendency of the title suit, the intervener initially filed an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC on 29.04.2010, which was dismissed as not pressed vide order dated 13.01.2011. Subsequently second intervener petition was filed on 08.08.2011 and due to persistent absence of the intervener, the same was rejected as not pressed on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top