SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Pramila Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Avilash Kumar, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.
2. At the outset, Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 2 has left of his heavenly abode that is why by order dated 30.03.2022 the name of the petitioner no. 2 was directed to be deleted and the same has been done. He submits that now he confines prayer only with regard to petitioner nos. 1 and 3. He further submits that petitioner no. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is brother-in-law (Dewar) of the complainant.
3. This petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 10.07.2013 passed in connection with C.P. Case No. 2118 of 2008 whereby discharge petition filed under section 245 Cr.P.C. has been rejected, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Dhanbad.
4. The complaint has been filed alleging therein the marriage between opposite party no.2 and Uttam Kumar Rai was solemnized on 10.02.2007 at Dhanbad and all the demanded articles were given to the accused persons except car and due to which the accused persons made a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.