Back
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Nimai Mandal @ Nimai Chandra Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 75 of 2023 instituted under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.
3. As per FIR, allegation is that earlier, one Arjun Mandal established physical relationship with the informant’s daughter (since deceased) on false assurance of marriage but he did not marry her and demanded Rs.5 lakhs as additional dowry. On 15.03.2023, when the informant along with her husband and son was outside of her house due to some work, petitioners in furtherance of their common intention along with others entered into the house of informant and found her daughter alone in the house, then they killed her by wrapping duppta around her neck and hanging by ceiling fan.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence at all rather they have been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity and being close relative of co-accused Arjun Mandal. It is further submitted that Arjun Mandal is the son of petitioner No.1 and the informan
Anticipatory bail can be granted when parties reach a compromise, with conditions ensuring dignity and cooperation in ongoing investigations.
Anticipatory bail granted due to general allegations and insufficient specificity against petitioners.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
