PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Kashi Ravidas – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Apprehending his arrest in connection with C.P. Case No. 1202 of 2020 instituted under Sections 323, 448, 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved to this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.
3. As per complaint petition, there is allegation of receiving Rs. 5,00,000/-(Rs. Five Lacs) as friendly loan on different date in the year 2020 but inspite of persistent demand petitioner has not returned the loan amount to the complainant by refusing in one or another pretext and cheated him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has denied receipt of any loan amount from the complainant and has been falsely implicated. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also abide by all terms and conditions which may be imposed in the matter of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner may be extended the privilege of anticipato
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.