M. G. UMA
Rajesh Irannakulgod – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 are before this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.25/2023 of Chandra Layout Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Ss. 506, 34, 504, 418, 403, 406, 420 and 354 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant Sri. G. Manoj Ranka.
2. Heard Sri. Dharmapal, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri. Krishna Kumar, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State and Sri. Ajay Kadkol, learned counsel for proposed respondent No.2. Perused the materials on record.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2. They are innocent and law abiding citizens. They have not committed any offence as alleged. They have been falsely implicated in the matter without any basis. They are having reasonable apprehension of being arrested. They are not having any criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that the petitioners received the amount from the complainant and they are willing to return the same and due to financial crunch, they could not return it in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.