IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
M/s. Uday Singh and Brothers through its proprietor Uday Singh - Petitioner
Versus
Central Coalfields Limited (C.C.L.), through its CMD and Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 2658 of 2021
Decided On : 29-03-2023
Tender - Quash letter - Prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon respondents to award said tender in favour of petitioner as it was declared L1 - Petitioner has also prayed for quashing letter issued by respondent no. 4 by which work order for said tender has been issued - Held, Petitioner has not fulfilled shortcomings found in required uploaded documents within stipulated time and as such respondent no. 4 has rightly cancelled its bid and has passed impugned order of banning it for two years – Court is of view that since impugned order of banning petitioner has failed to overcome test of compliance of principles of natural justice i.e., requirement of serving prior show cause notice, there is no need to enter into other contentions of learned counsel for respondent-CCL - Impugned letter issued by respondent no. 4 cannot be sustained in law and hence same is quashed - Writ petition is allowed.
ORDER :
1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the letter dated 24.05.2021 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent no. 4- Staff Officer (E&M), Piperwar Area, Central Coalfields Limited (CCL) to the petitioner whereby it has been banned for two years from being eligible to submit bid in Coal India Limited (CIL) and its subsidiaries with immediate effect alleging violation of Clause-14.2 (B), (C) & (E) of NIT No. SO(E&M)/PPR/e-NIT/20-21/97 dated 02.01.2021 (hereinafter to be referred “as the said tender”). Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the respondents to award the said tender in favour of the petitioner as it was declared L1. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the letter dated 24.06.2021 issued by the respondent no. 4 by which work order for the said tender has been issued in favour of Sweta Construction, Bachra, District- Chatra (the respondent no 5).
2. Mr. Kalyan Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner, while arguing the case, confines the prayer only to the extent of quashing letter dated 24.05.2021 issued by the respondent no. 4 in connection with NIT No. SO(E&M)/PPR/e-NIT/20-21/97 dated 02.01.2021 whereby the petitioner has been banned for two years from being eligible to submit bid in CIL and its subsidiaries with immediate effect alleging violation of Clause-14.2(B), (C) & (E) of said NIT.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said tender was invited by Electrical and Mechanical (E&M) Department of CCL, Piparwar Area, Chatra for the work of “repairing and maintenance of 11 KV, 440 volts overhead lines, light fittings, transformers etc. installed at Garhi Filter Plant, Bachra Siding, Kalyanpur Coal Dump, rehabilitation centre under CHP-CPP for a period of 1 year”. The petitioner participated in the said tender and submitted its online bid on 11.01.2021. It also submitted all the documents on the same day which were required to meet the eligibility criteria as per the provisions of the said NIT. On submission of bid, the petitioner was declared L1. However, after technical evaluation of documents uploaded by the petitioner, some deficiencies were found by the tender committee and as such, the petitioner was requested to upload required shortfall documents within 7 days w.e.f. 26.01.2021 at 11:00 a.m. to 02.02.2021 at 11:00 A.M. on e-portal of Coal India Limited as per Clause 14.2(B) of the said NIT which was duly uploaded by it on 01.02.2021 in the e-procurement system of CCL.
4. It is further submitted that though a valid electrical contractor license was uploaded in the portal by the petitioner along with valid license of electrical wireman having authorization for working in HT overhead line and HT installations, however the evaluator gave wrong description of the shortfall documents submitted by the petitioner on the e-procurement system of CCL, pursuant to which, the respondent no. 4, vide letter dated 24.05.2021, ordered for banning the business of the petitioner for 2 years from being eligible to submit bid in CIL and its subsidiaries with immediate effect.
5. It is also submitted that issuance of letter dated 24.05.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and bad in law as no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner at any point of time. Moreover, no opportunity of hearing was given before passing the order of banning it from submitting the future tenders of CIL and its subsidiaries. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the guidelines as mentioned in the e-tender notice under the heading “Guidelines for Banning of Business” have to be strictly followed by CIL and its subsidiary companies for effecting ‘Banning of Business’ in respect of works and services contracts. Clause-1 of the said guidelines specifically speaks about the ‘observance of principles of natural justice’ before banning the business dealings with any contracting entity which is completely absent in the present case. It is a settled principal of law that
Kulja Industries Limited Vs. Chief General Manager
Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. v. State of West Bengal & Another reported in (1975) 1 SCC 70
Gorkha Security Services Vs. Government (NCT of Delhi) & Others reported (2014) 9 SCC 105
The mandatory requirement of serving a show cause notice specifying the grounds on which the action is proposed to be taken before blacklisting a party, as established in relevant case laws.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to comply with the principles of natural justice, including providing a fair hearing, in the process of blacklisting a bidder.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a clear mention of the proposed blacklisting action in the show cause notice, as well as the need to adhere to principles of na....
The court emphasized the need for strict observance of the principles of natural justice before passing an order of blacklisting and highlighted the requirement of a valid, particularised, and unambi....
The requirement for a fair hearing and a specific show cause notice before imposing the severe civil consequence of blacklisting, and the need for the authority to determine the period of punishment ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.