Back
K. L. Jute Products Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Though the matter comes up on misc. application filed by the petitioner for seeking interim relief of participating in tender process, however, this Court with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, dispose of the present writ petition finally.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-firm challenging the order dated 24.04.2012 (Annex.16), whereby, the respondents have passed an order of (i) blacklisting the petitioner-firm for a term of three years, (ii) The petitioner-firm has been banned from entering into any business of the respondents, and (iii) The earnest money of the petitioner-firm has been forfeited.
3. Brief facts, as narrated, in the present writ petition are that the petitioner-firm had participated in the tender process for supply of packing/processing material and other consumable items on Rate Contract basis for the respondents in pursuance of tender floated by the respondents on 21.05.2010.
4. The petitioner is said to be a successful bidder in the tender process and it was awarded the contract. The petitioner has pleaded that after fulfilling tender conditions and supplying all materials to the respondents, due payment was mad
The requirement for a fair hearing and a specific show cause notice before imposing the severe civil consequence of blacklisting, and the need for the authority to determine the period of punishment ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a clear mention of the proposed blacklisting action in the show cause notice, as well as the need to adhere to principles of na....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
