SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 1089

RAJESH KUMAR
Subhan Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar, Ms. Chandana Kumari.
For the Opp.Parties : Mr. Shekhar Sinha.

JUDGMENT :

1. The present revision application has been filed against the order dated 26.07.2018, passed in Misc. Criminal Application No.737 of 2018, arising out of Tatisilway P.S. Case No.43 of 2014, corresponding to G.R. No.2914 of 2014 (S.T. No.683 of 2014), whereby the court of learned A.J.C.-VI, Ranchi, has dismissed the prayer of the petitioner to recall the P.W.-3, Parvati Devi, P.W.-4, Rajesh Mahto, P.W.-5, Amarjit Goswami and P.W.-6, Pritam Mahto, for the purpose of cross-examination.

2. It has been submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the aforesaid witnesses have been examined on 04.05.2017. The conducting lawyer in the court below was ill and as such, a petition has been filed on the same day, which has been taken note by the court below, but still the cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses, has not been deferred, as requested by the junior counsel for the petitioner, and the court below has rejected the application on the ground that this is a delaying tactics on the part of the defence counsel.

It has further been submitted by the learned senior counsel that the right of cross-examination is a valuable right to the victim and it cann

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top