RAJESH KUMAR
Subhan Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present revision application has been filed against the order dated 26.07.2018, passed in Misc. Criminal Application No.737 of 2018, arising out of Tatisilway P.S. Case No.43 of 2014, corresponding to G.R. No.2914 of 2014 (S.T. No.683 of 2014), whereby the court of learned A.J.C.-VI, Ranchi, has dismissed the prayer of the petitioner to recall the P.W.-3, Parvati Devi, P.W.-4, Rajesh Mahto, P.W.-5, Amarjit Goswami and P.W.-6, Pritam Mahto, for the purpose of cross-examination.
2. It has been submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the aforesaid witnesses have been examined on 04.05.2017. The conducting lawyer in the court below was ill and as such, a petition has been filed on the same day, which has been taken note by the court below, but still the cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses, has not been deferred, as requested by the junior counsel for the petitioner, and the court below has rejected the application on the ground that this is a delaying tactics on the part of the defence counsel.
It has further been submitted by the learned senior counsel that the right of cross-examination is a valuable right to the victim and it cann
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.