Jamal Mian, S/o. Late Roshan vs State of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 1075

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Jamal Mian, S/o. Late Roshan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. P.P.N. Roy, the learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners alongwith Mr. Pandey Ashok Nath Roy, Advocate.

2. Heard Mr. Jitendra Pandey, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party-State.

3. This criminal revision has been filed against the judgment dated 13.06.2012 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (L.A), Hazaribag in Criminal Appeal No. 241/11 whereby and whereunder the learned appellate court has dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the petitioners and modified the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 09.12.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag in G.R. No. 2954/2001 corresponding to T.R. No. 1784/2011.

4. The conviction and sentence of the petitioners passed by the learned trial court as well as learned appellate are given in tabular form as under: -

Petitioner Numbers

Conviction by Trial Court

Conviction by Appellate Court

Sentence by Trial Court

Sentence by Appellate Court

1 to 4,6 to 11

u/s 147, 148, 341, 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 1075

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARYJamal Mian, S/o. Late Roshan – AppellantVersusState of Jharkhand – Respondent

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Jamal Mian, S/o. Late Roshan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent