SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 667

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Gopal Sharma son of Somaru Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Heard Ms. Vani Kumari, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Heard Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of Opposite Party-State.

3. The present criminal revision application is directed against the Judgment dated 28.04.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Palamau at Daltonganj in Criminal Appeal No. 85/2006 whereby and whereunder the appellate court confirmed the conviction of the petitioners under Sections 341, 323, 325, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, but modified their sentences by awarding separate sentences under Sections 341, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and maintaining their sentences for the offence under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The learned trial court, vide Judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 29.08.2006 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in G.R. No. 1426 of 2001/Tr. No. 902 of 2006 (arising out of Haidar Nagar P.S. Case No. 24/2001 dated 09.11.2001), had convicted and sentenced the petitioners as under:

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top