Back
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Md. Fakruddin son of late Mohid – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Gautam Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party- State.
3. The present criminal revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 05.12.2013 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 94 of 2013 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Sahebganj, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. The appeal was filed against judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 02.08.2013 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal in G.R. Case No. 61 of 2011 corresponding to T.R. No. 744 of 2013 whereby the petitioner was held guilty of offence under Sections 406/409 of Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three years under Section 409 of Indian Penal Code with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, the petitioner was directed to undergo Simple Imprisonment for two months. Further, for the offence under Section 406 of Indian Penal Code, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, the pe
The main legal point established is that the presence of the accused at the site of embezzlement and the withdrawal of funds under joint signature can establish criminal liability. Additionally, the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that failure to complete contracted work and embezzlement of government funds can lead to conviction under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.
The conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act was confirmed based on sufficient evidence of misappropriation by the accused, emphasizing statutory minimum sentencing.
For an offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with Section 15 of PC Act, it is necessary to establish that a public servant has attempted to obtain for himself or for any other person any....
The Court upheld the conviction and sentence for criminal misappropriation under Section 408 of IPC, emphasizing the importance of entrustment and the duty of an employee to work with devotion when f....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
