ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Heard Mr. Suraj Verma, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of Opposite Party-State.
3. This criminal revision is directed against the judgment dated 19.12.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Criminal Appeal No. 30 of 2012 whereby and whereunder the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence of the petitioners for the offences under Sections 406/34 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code passed by the learned trial court was affirmed and their conviction and sentence under Section 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code was set aside and the appeal was partly allowed, but dismissed on the point of judgment and order of conviction under Sections 406/34 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. The petitioners had preferred the criminal appeal against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 18.02.2012 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chaibasa in G.R. Case No. 342 of 2004/T.R. No. 06 of 2012 (arising out of Noamundi P.S. Case No. 25 of 2004 dated 07.08.2004 whereby and whereunder the petitioners were held guil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.