ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Vinod Prasad @ Binod Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Heard Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party-State.
3. The present criminal revision application is directed against the Judgment dated 27.07.2012 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Latehar in Criminal Appeal No. 14/2011 whereby and whereunder the conviction and sentence of the petitioners under Sections 323, 448, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code was upheld, although they were acquitted from the offence under Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code and the criminal appeal was partly allowed.
4. The learned trial court, vide Judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 14.09.2011 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in G.R. Case No. 557 of 2008 / Tr. No. 535 of 2011 (arising out of Barwadih P.S. Case No. 81/2008 dated 24.12.2008), had convicted the petitioners under Sections 341, 323, 448, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and had sentenced them to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 06 months on each offence and all the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
Submissions on behalf of the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.