Back
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Raju Burman son of Balram Burman – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Heard Ms. Priya Shrestha, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the opposite party - State.
3. The present criminal revision application is directed against the order dated 18.08.2012 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Giridih in Cr. Appeal No. 59/2010, whereby the learned appellate court upheld the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code passed on 02.08.2010 by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in G.R. Case No. 1676/2006, T.R. No. 229/2010. However, the learned appellate court set-aside the conviction and sentence of the petitioner for offence under Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and also acquitted the other 06 accused persons from all the charges thereunder.
4. The learned trial court had convicted the petitioner and 06 others under Section 498(A) of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and had sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for offence under Section 498(A) of IPC and rigorous imprisonment for one year for offence under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of specific allegations, consistent evidence, and the nature of evidence in upholding a conviction under Section 498(A) of the Ind....
Offence of Cruelty - Conviction affirmed - Scope of revisional jurisdiction this court is not inclined to interfere with impugned judgment of conviction of petitioner under section 498(A) of Indian P....
Insufficient specific evidence to sustain conviction for cruelty under IPC 498-A; general allegations are inadequate for liability.
Offence of Cruelty - Convicted - Trial Court rightly modified sentence - Benefit of under Act, 1958 - Court finds that courts below have rightly convicted petitioner under Section 498-A of Indian Pen....
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 498-A IPC, ruling that previous acquittal did not bar retrial due to distinct allegations, and sufficient evidence of cruelty and dowry demands was est....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
