ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Pushpendra Kumar Sinha, son of Late Mithilesh Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner vide Vigilance (Special) Case No. 20 of 2013 (corresponding to Vigilance P.S. Case No. 19 of 2013) registered under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 13(1) (c) (d) and under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and also to quash the order dated 06.08.2021, passed by the learned Special Judge, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Ranchi in Misc. Cr. Application No. 1171 of 2019 and to quash/set aside, with all consequences, the order framing charge dated 18.11.2021 as well as the charges framed on 18.11.2021.
3. The brief facts of the case is that The First Information Report in this case was registered with the allegation that under APDRP scheme related to the towns of Ranchi, Khunti, Ramgarh, Jamtara and Pakur, it was detected that illegal allotment of tender was given to the contractor under criminal conspiracy by the petitioner along with the co-accused persons by misusing their power and p
Harshendra Kumar D. Versus Rebatilata Koley and others (2011) 3 SCC 351
Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor
Soma Chakravarty v. State through C.B.I. reported in (2007) 5 SCC 403
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2003) 2 SCC 711
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi [(2005) 1 SCC 568]
Supdt. and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs
State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh [(1977) 4 SCC 39 : 1977 SCC(Cri) 533]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.