KAILASH PRASAD DEO
Kushu Mondal – Appellant
Versus
Parmanand Mondal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard, learned counsel for the parties.
2. The claimant/injured, Kushu Mondal has preferred this appeal for enhancement of the award dated 24.03.2018, passed by learned District Judge, XVI-cum-P.O., M.V.A.C.T., Dhanbad in Motor Accident Claim Case No.286 of 2016, whereby the claimant, who sustained injury 60% of permanent disability at the age of 45 years because of amputation of left leg below knee has been awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.4,94,800/-along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim application till the date of realization.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha has submitted that the learned Tribunal has considered the less income of the injured to the tune of Rs.3,500/-, while computing compensation though minimum wages for highly skilled person as notified by the Government in the year, 2015-16 i.e. Rs 342.6/- per day and the monthly income excluding four Sundays comes to Rs.8,909/-(Rs.342.6 x 26 days), which is the minimum income that person can earn normally, but herein the injured was not engage
C.K. Subramania Iyer v. T. Kunhikuttan Nair
R.D. Hattangadi v. Pest Control (India) (P) Ltd.
Arvind Kumar Mishra v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Yadava Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Sarla Verma & Ors Vs. DTC & Anr. reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs, Pranay Sethi
Mallikarjun vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. reported in 2014 (14) SCC 396
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.