SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Vivek Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through its Secretary Govt. of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein following prayers have been made :
(ii) to quash the order dated 01.06.2012 (annexure-2) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Pakur in RMP Case No.01/2012;
(iii) to quash the appellate order dated 14.03.2013 (Annexure-7) passed by the Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka in R.M.R. No.512/12-13,
whereby and whereunder, the respondent authorities initiated a proceeding against the petitioners under Public Land Encroachment Act vide Revenue Misc. Case No.04/2012-13 for eviction from plot no.675 and during pendency of the said proceeding, the learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Pakur issued a letter no.201/D.B. dated 30.05.2012 to the Deputy Commissioner of Pakurwith a recommendation to cancel the settlement of the aforesaid plot with the petitioners ancestors and for taking steps for their eviction.
2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition, which is required to be enumerated, read as under:
It is the case of the petitioner that the last settlement of plot no.675 appertaining to
Pepsico India Holding (P) Ltd. vs. Krishna Kant Pandey
Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao vs. Ashalata S. Guram
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Gauhati and Ors.
Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaque
Nagendra Nath v. Commr. of Hills Division
Kaushalya Devi v. Bachittar Singh
State Bank of India and Ors. vs. Atindra Nath Bhattacharyya and Anr.
Escorts Farms Ltd. vs. Commissioner, Kumaon Division, Nainital, U.P. & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.