ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Vrindavan, a Sweet shop through its proprietor owned by Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation through its Director – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard the parties.
2. This Appeal under Section 82 (2) of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 has been preferred against the Order dated 21.01.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Ranchi, in E.S.I. Case No.02 of 2003 by which the labour court has dismissed the petition filed under Section 75 (1) (a) and (g) of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 by the appellant herein.
3. The brief facts of this case is that the Insurance Inspector of the Employees’ State Insurance visited the sweets and namkeen shop of the appellant in the name and style of M/s. Vrindavan on 01.04.1998 and on the next day i.e. 02.04.1998, he conducted a survey and found that altogether 27 employees were employed by the said M/s. Vrindavan and to other establishments which can be clubbed together for the purpose of the provisions of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. Out of the 2 establishments which were brought one chat shop was running in the verandah of M/s. Vrindavan for which payments were collected at the counter of M/s. Vrindavan and another establishment from which sweets and namke
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.