SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 859

DEEPAK ROSHAN
Purnendu Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey.

JUDGMENT :

Heard leaned counsel for the parties.

2. At the outset it appears from the order dated 13.10.2022 that due to typographical error this case has been abated against the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 in place of petitioner nos. 1 and 3.

3. Accordingly order dated 13.10.2022 is hereby modified to the extent that the Cr. Rev. Application No. 1099 of 2008 is abated against the petitioner nos. 1 and 3-namely, Tusar Kanti Roy and Ardhendu Roy, respectively.

4. Since both these revision applications arise out of same judgment passed by the appellate court and are also interconnected with the same P.S. case, as such they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.

5. Both these applications have been preferred against the judgment dated 23.07.2008 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Jamtara, in Cr. Appeal No. 09 of 2008; whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.03.2008 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in P.C.R. Case No. 46 of 2005 (T.R. No. 289 of 2008); whereby the petitioners have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years and a fine of Rs. 3000/- each for the offence under section 498 A IPC and appeal filed by the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top