Man Kumar Pradhan vs State of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 1109

DEEPAK ROSHAN
Man Kumar Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ms. Apurwa Pathak, Mr. Vibhor Mayank.
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Mr. Ram Prakash Singh.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Since both these revision applications arise out of the common judgment, as such both are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.

3. These revision applications are directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15.03.2005 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C,-I, Chaibasa in Cr. appeal No. 50 of 1997; whereby the judgment of conviction dated 24.11.1997 and orders of sentence dated 25.11.1997 passed by the learned 2nd Assistant Sessions Judge at Chaibasa, in S.T. No. 130 of 1993 (Trial No. 38/1994) in connection with Chakradharpur, P.S. Case No. 04/1992 corresponding to G.R. No. 11/1992 against both the petitioners in Cr. Rev. No. 549 of 2005, namely, Man Kumar Pradhan and Anant Kumar Pradhan and the sole petitioner- Pradip Kumar Pradhan @ Pradeep Pradhan in Cr. Rev. No. 632 of 2005 to undergo R.I. for 3 years and 5 years respectively, for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 34 IPC has been affirmed while the convictions of the latter for the offences punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, has been set aside.

4. Ms. Apurwa Pathak, learned c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document