JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy and Mr. Ravi Kerketta, learned counsel for the State.

2. In these petitions, common complaint case and common order taking cognizance are challenged and that is why all these petitions have been heard together with consent of the parties.

3. These petitions have been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 11.07.2016 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in Complaint Case No. 850/2016, pending in that court.

4. The complaint case has been filed alleging therein that the complainant is a non-resident Indian, a Doctor by profession who booked a commercial unit from the accused who is a Limited Company, engaged in developing, constructing and building residential and commercial properties, in one of its project known as Capital Tower-1, Complex located at Sector 26, Gurgaon, Haryana. At the time of launch of the aforesaid project, a wide promotional campaign was undertaken by the accused by advertisements and sales promotion employees. It h