SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Mahal Industries – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand State Electricity Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the Letter No. 76 dated 12.09.2013 and Letter No. 452 dated 19.09.2013 by which a demand of Rs. 37,752/- has been raised against the petitioner which was to be paid by the erstwhile occupier of the premises, namely, Shri Arvind Kumar Singh in relation to Khata No. 44, Plot No. 1245 situated at Mouza-Mahilong, Thana No. 176, P.S. Tatisilwai, District-Ranchi.
2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition which requires to be enumerated, reads as under:
The petitioner, after making the said application for getting electricity connection, has received a let
Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao vs. Ashalata S. Guram
Hari Vishnu Kamath vs. Ahmad Ishaque
Heinz India (P) Ltd. and Another vs. State of U.P. and Others
Kaushalya Devi vs. Bachittar Singh
Nagendra Nath vs. Commr. of Hills Division
Pepsico India Holding (P) Ltd. vs. Krishna Kant Pandey
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.