SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Anindita Steels Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking therein following reliefs :-
(a.) Quashing/setting aside with all consequences the order of demand as contained in letter no.849 dated 14.6.2018 passed by the District Mining Officer, Chaibasa, (Annexure- 11), holding and declaring the same to be a nullity, in violation of the principles of natural justice, illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction;
(b.) quashing the subsequent order as contained in letter dated 03.05.2019 of the District Mining Officer (Annexure- 18) whereby he has refused to amend/correct/reconsider the said order dated 14.6.2018;
(c.) quashing/setting aside the revisional order dated 07.07.2020 (Annexure-20) passed in Revision Application no. 6/(7)/2019/RC-I of 2019 by the Joint Secretary & Revisional Authority, Ministry of Mines, Govt. of India, holding the same to be illegal, arbitrary and suffering from Wednesbury unreasonableness;
(d.) during the pendency of this petition:-
(ii) no coercive steps be issued pursuant thereto;
(iii) the respondent authorities of the Mining department of Jharkhand be rest
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.