N. ANAND VENKATESH
G. Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Villupuram – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the 2nd respondent's proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.A- 2/4085/10 dated 26.08.2010 as confirmed by the 1st respondent's proceedings bearing Na.Ka.A/Geology and Mining /1021/2010, dated 23.10.2012.
Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the 2nd respondent's proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.A- 2/4481/10 dated 26.08.2010 as confirmed by the 1st respondent's proceedings bearing Na.Ka.A/Geology and Mining /1019/2010, dated 23.10.2012.)
Common Order
1. The issue involved in both these Writ Petitions are common and hence, they are taken up together, heard and disposed of through this Common Order.
2. The petitioners have filed these Writ Petitions challenging the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 26.8.2010 and which was confirmed in Appeal by the 1st respondent through Orders dated 14.11.2012 and 23.10.2012 respectively.
3. The case of the petitioners is that they are agriculturists and while so, a show cause notice came to
For the purpose of Rule 35-A, if the Government feels that the orders passed by the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, on 16.10.2018 were not in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the D....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of observing the principles of natural justice in administrative decisions, and the requirement for authorities to consider relevant....
The court emphasized the importance of providing a copy of inspection reports and an opportunity of hearing before raising a demand against a party.
The jurisdiction under Article 226 is not available if alternative remedies exist, and exhausting statutory remedies is mandatory before judicial intervention.
The conviction for illegal quarrying under Sections 379 IPC and Section 3(1) TNPPDL Act was upheld due to sufficient evidence, while the overlap of charges under various laws does not invalidate pros....
The judgment establishes the principle that the observance of natural justice, including providing an opportunity to be heard and access to relevant documents, is essential before taking any adverse ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.