SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Dilip Kumar Sharma, S/o Late Gauri Shankar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for quashing of the order dated 18.10.1995 passed by the Circle Officer, Dumka in R.M. Case No.14/95-96 and order dated 20.02.2002/01.04.2002 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Dumka in Rev. Misc. Appeal No.59/1995-96, whereby and whereunder the circle officer , Dumka had mutated the names of opposite parties nos.4 to 6 and thereafter Deputy Commissioner (Respondent No.2) issued orders and directions to the circle officer to enter the name of the opposite parties nos.4 to 6 with respect to the portion of Plot no. 1626 of Dumka Town, in Register-II and also rent receipts.
2. The brief fact of the case, as per the pleading made in the writ petition, required to be enumerated, reads as under:
3. It is the case of the petitioners that they are the absolute owners having subsisting title to a piece of land measuring 10 Kathas 17 Dhurs and bearing plot no.1626 situated in the town of Dumka, District-Dumka. The aforesaid land once upon a time belonged to one Probodh Chandra Dey. The said Prabodh Chandra Dey executed a deed of lease with respect to a portion of aforesaid plot no.1626 in favour of lat
Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar v. Arthur Import & Export Co.
Municipal Corporation., Aurangabad through its commissioner vs. State of Maharashtra and another
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad v. State of Maharashtra
Prahlad Pradhan v. Sonu Kumhar
Rajinder Singh v. State of J&K
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.