SUBHASH CHAND
Birju Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhash Chand, J.
The instant criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.01.2012 passed in Sessions Case No.208 of 2006, arising out of Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 1985, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 210 of 1985 and P.C.R. Case No.62 of 1985 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar whereby the appellant no.1 Birju Mandal was held guilty for the offence under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and sentenced with rigorous imprisonment of six months and a fine of Rs.5,000/-. In default of payment of fine, the additional rigorous imprisonment of 15 days was directed to undergo. Appellant no.2 Surju @ Surya Narayan Mandal was held guilty for the offence under section 323 of IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month while the appellant no.3 Ram Chandra Mandal was held guilty for the offence under section 307 of IPC and was sentenced with rigorous imprisonment of five years and a fine of Rs.7,000/-. In default of payment of fine further rigorous imprisonment of one month was directed to undergo.
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case l
Vijay Shankar Shinde v. State of Maharashtra
Ravishwar Manjhi v. State of Jharkhand
Ashok Kr. Choudhary v. State of Bihar
Mohd. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of W.B.
Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan
The main legal point established in the judgment is the analysis of evidence, including oral and documentary evidence, and the testimony of witnesses, to determine the sustainability of the judgment ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the consistency of the informant's testimony, corroboration by material particulars, and medical evidence to establish guilt beyond....
The prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt due to reliance on uncorroborated eyewitness testimony from interested parties and lack of independent evidence.
Conviction based on corroborated eyewitness testimony and medical evidence can be upheld despite procedural lapses; compensation imposed for injuries.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellant's assault with a deadly weapon, causing grievous injuries to the victim, demonstrated the intention and knowledge to commit murd....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.