SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Munna Paswan, S/o Sri Birpati Hazari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J:
1. The case has been listed under the heading for Orders (with defects) with the office note that defect nos. 1 and 2 still exists.
2. Mr. Anjani Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that so far as defect no. 1 is concerned it relates to payment of authentication fee of Rs. 10/-, which shall be removed in course of day. So far defect no. 2 is concerned, it has been submitted that the same may be ignored as the same relates to filing of all the annexures as annexed with the writ petition with the instant memo of appeal.
3. This Court considering the fact that the instant memo of appeal has been placed with the record of writ petition, as such defect no. 2 is ignored.
4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up at this stage for hearing.
5. The instant intra-court appeal, under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, is directed against common order dated 21.06.2022 passed in W.P. (S) No. 2988 of 2016, by which the case of the appellants has been disposed of in terms of order dated 09.08.2019 passed in L.P.A. No. 196 of 2012 with L.P.A. No. 404 of 2012, in which, order dated 17.11.20211 passed in W.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.