SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Bhola Ram S/o Late Chandrika Dusadh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has submitted that the instant case may also be heard together with L.P.A. No. 303 of 2022 i.e. L.P.A. No. 312 of 2022 and L.P.A. No. 324 of 2022, since, similar issues are involved in all these three appeals.
3. Considering the same, all the three appeals are being heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
4. Before entering into the merit of the issue, it requires to deal with the issue of limitation, since, all the appeals have been filed after the period of limitation.
I.A. No. 10659 of 2022 in L.P.A. No. 303 of 2022
5. This interlocutory Application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 32 days in filing the instant Appeal.
6. Considering the sufficient cause that the appellants are poor persons and they could not arrange the required money for filing of the instant L.P.A. before this Hon'ble Court, well within time and hence, there is delay of 32 days in filing the present L.P.A. thus, the delay of 32 days in preferring the appeal is hereby
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.