IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.
Swami Vivekanand Seva Trust, Jamshedpur through its President Dr. Ranjit Choudhary - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi and ors. – Respondents
W.P. (Cr.) No. 240 of 2005, W.P. (Cr.) No. 91, 186 of 2021
Decided On : 19-09-2023
CBI Investigation - Misappropriation of Funds - Indian Penal Code - Sections 419/420/406 - Sections 406, 409, 420, 34 - D.O. letter dated 05.02.2004 of Director, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India - Request for CBI investigation - Quashing of FIR - Transfer of Case to CBI - T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala - Babubhai v. State of Gujarat
Fact of the Case:
The case involved misappropriation of funds by Saroj Kumar Das, who fraudulently received and misappropriated a substantial sum released by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, in connection with a trust. Multiple petitions were filed, including a request for transferring the case to the CBI and quashing the FIRs.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the embezzlement of funds in both FIRs was the same and that the second FIR for the same transaction was unwarranted. It also considered the request by the Government of India for CBI investigation and directed the transfer of all related cases to the CBI for re-investigation.
Issues: The issues involved the misappropriation of funds, the validity of the second FIR, and the request for CBI investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that for similar transactions, a second FIR is unwarranted. It also considered the request for CBI investigation and directed the transfer of all related cases to the CBI for re-investigation.
Final Decision: The court directed the transfer of all related cases to the CBI for re-investigation and ordered the closure of any pending proceedings related to the first and second FIRs.
JUDGMENT :
1. In all these writ petitions, common question of fact and laws are involved and that is why, all these writ petitions have been heard together with consent of the parties.
2. Heard Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P. (Cr.) Nos. 240 of 2005 and 91 of 2021, Mr. Shankar Lal Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent no.11 in W.P. (Cr.) No.240 of 2005 and learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P. (Cr.) No.186 of 2021, Mr. Manoj Kumar and Mr. Faisal Allam, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Nitish Parth Sarthi, learned A.C. to A.S.G.I., appearing for the CBI.
3. In W.P. (Cr.) No.240 of 2005, the prayer is made for transferring the case to the CBI in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No. 154/2003 in light of D.O. letter dated 05.02.2004 of Director, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India.
4. Prakash Chandra Nandi in the capacity of founder trustee of Swami Vivekananda Seva Trust (hereinafter to be referred to as “SVST”), Jamshedpur made a written report dated 05.08.2003 to the Officer-in-Charge, Bistupur Police Station, Jamshedpur informing him about the criminal acts of Saroj Kumar Das who misused his former identity of being erstwhile Secretary of SVST opened another Trust with a deceptively similar name being Swami Vivekananda Trust and in the garb of the aforesaid trust, fraudulently and dishonestly received and criminally misappropriated a huge sum amounting to Rs.42,17,819/-released by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi in favour of the SVST. For this purpose, illegal banking transactions were also carried out. On discovery whereof, Prakash Chandra Nandi made the aforesaid report dated 06.08.2003 to the Officer-in-Charge of Bistupur Police Station. Hence, Bistupur P.S. Case No.154/2003 was registered under Sections 419/420/406 of the Indian Penal Code.
5. In W.P. (Cr.) No.91 of 2021, the prayer is made for quashing the second FIR being Bistupur P.S. Case No.60/2021, dated 24.02.2021 registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.
6. In W.P. (Cr.) No.186 of 2021 also, the prayer is made for quashing the FIR being Bistupur P.S. Case No.60/2021, dated 24.02.2021 registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.
7. Bistupur P.S. Case No.60/2021 was registered on the basis of a typewritten report dated 24.02.2021 of Shri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, District Welfare Officer, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur alleging therein that there was misappropriation of Rs.19,44,780/-and Rs.22,73,039/-(total Rs.42,17,819/-) granted by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India in the financial year 2003, released on 31.01.2003 and 31.03.2003 as grant for running of primitive tribe girls' hostel, which was received by a person named Saroj Das. The money was received in favour of SVST, when the President of the Trust was one Ranjit Choudhary and Secretary was one Nakul Chandra Pramanik. It was further alleged that on 18.08.2020, a utilization certificate has been demanded from the organization, who replied on 19.08.2020 that they never received by its former Secretary-Saroj Das who misappropriated it. It has been stated by the informant that it seems that SVST, its former Secretary-Saroj Das, the then President Ranjit Choudhary, the then Secretary-Nakul Chandra Pramanik, the present President, the present Secretary-Kamal Kanti Das, the then Trustee Kamal Das, the then Trustee Prakash Chandra Nandi, the then Accountant Ashim Bose and all the trustees belonging to the period starting from 2002-03 till date have together misappropriated the said amount of the Government of India by obtaining it fraudulently.
8. Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.(Cr.) Nos.240 of 2005 and 91 of 2021 submits that Dr. Ranjit Choudhury was the Trustee and President of SVST and Prak
Amitbhai Anilchandra Shah v. C.B.I.
Babubhai v. State of Gujarat and others
Chirra Shivraj v. State of A.P.
Narmada Bai v. State of Gujarat
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for similar transactions, a second FIR is unwarranted, and the court has the authority to direct the transfer of cases to the CBI for re-inves....
The court clarified that the CBI had jurisdiction to investigate the case without specific consent under Section 6 of the DSPE Act and that the lack of specific consent did not result in a miscarriag....
The court can direct a CBI investigation when local investigations are compromised, ensuring fairness and justice in legal proceedings.
Court mandated an independent investigation by the CBI into allegations of financial irregularities involving public officials to maintain credibility and protect public interest.
Lack of sanction for prosecution is not always fatal to case of prosecution.
Police have statutory right and duty to investigate cognizable offence, and Court would not stop any investigation into cognizable offence. Only in case where no cognizable offence of any kind is dis....
The court emphasized the importance of thorough examination of allegations before transferring an investigation to CBI and highlighted the petitioner's failure to register an FIR or seek remedy under....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.