SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, RATNAKER BHENGRA
Khirodhar Mahto, son of Mohan Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) :
Sewak Mahto, Sugiya Devi, Gyani Mahto and Rajendra Mahto faced the trial on the charge under sections 341/34, 323/34, 504/34, 506/34 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. They have been found guilty of committing the offence under sections 341 and 323 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to SI for one month and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-each under section 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code and RI for six months and a fine of Rs. 5,000/-each under section 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code with default stipulations. The trial Judge has passed a further direction to pay the fine amount to the informant and his wife who are the victims.
2. The appellants were however acquitted of the charge under sections 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Khirodhar Mahto who is the informant of this case has filed Acquittal Appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed in S.T. No. 250 of 2017.
4. Barkagaon PS Case No. 179 of 2016 was registered on the basis of a written report given by Khirodhar Mahto to the officer-in-charge of Barkagaon police station making allegations of marpit and assault in the morning of 25th July 2016 by the ab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.