JUDGMENT :

The writ petitioner who suffered dismissal of W.P.(C) No. 3569 of 2012 has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.

2. Before the writ Court, the order dated 16th May 2011 passed by the Jharkhand State Information Commission in Appeal Case No. 1462 of 2010 was put to challenge.

3. The writ Court has dismissed W.P.(C) No. 3569 of 2012 after the following consideration:

“After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on the basis of the materials brought on record, it appears that the writ petitioner Kumari Ranjana, Child Development Project Officer has not annexed the documents to establish that information sought for by the appellant/respondent no. 2 Soukat Ali under Right to Information Act, 2005 was supplied within time, rather the Letter No. 147 dated 15.04.2010 itself shows that the information was provided on 15.04.2010 only after preferring the appeal before the Jharkhand State Information Commission by appellant/respondent no. 2 Soukat Ali, which was registered as Appeal No. 1462/2010.

Under the aforesaid circumstances, in absence of any documentary evidence brought on record by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to