SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 1382

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Dineshar Tiwari S/o Late Sukhdeo Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anurag Kashyap.
For the Respondent: Vineet Kr. Vashistha.

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard the parties.

2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash the orders dated 13.04.2022, 27.04.2022 and 12.04.2023 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in Latehar P.S. Case No. 112 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No. 500 of 2010 registered for the offence punishable under Section 409, 420 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar whereby and where under cognizance under Sections 409, 420 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken, non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued and processes under Sections 82 and 83 of Cr.P.C. have been issued against the petitioner, respectively.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not press this Cr. M.P. to quash the order dated 13.04.2022 and confines his prayer to quash the orders dated 27.04.2022 and 12.04.2023 passed in the said case.

4. The brief facts of the case is that on 27.04.2022, the petitioner who was the accused of the said Latehar P.S. Case No. 112 of 2010 cor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top