SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Prabha Agarwal @ Prabha, W/o. Praveen Agarwal @ Praveen Kumar & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Opposite Party
Cr.M.P. No. 165 of 2024
Decided On : 28-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Rohit Agarwal.
For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. P.P.

IMPORTANT POINT
The issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamations must comply with mandatory legal requirements, including recording satisfaction of evading arrest and specifying time and place for appearance.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 73 and 82 - Non-bailable warrant of arrest and proclamation - Issuance of non-bailable warrant without recording satisfaction of evading arrest is illegal - Proclamation under Section 82 must record satisfaction of absconding and specify time and place for appearance - Orders quashed. (Paras 8, 9, 10)

(B) Legal principles - The court must ensure compliance with mandatory requirements before issuing non-bailable warrants and proclamations under the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:

The petitioners challenged the issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamations by the Chief Judicial Magistrate without proper legal basis or satisfaction of the conditions required under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Findings of Court:

The court found that the orders issued were not sustainable in law due to lack of necessary satisfaction and procedural compliance.

Issues: The main issues were whether the Chief Judicial Magistrate recorded satisfaction regarding the petitioners evading arrest and whether the proclamation under Section 82 was issued in accordance with the law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the issuance of non-bailable warrants and proclamations must adhere to the mandatory requirements of law, failing which they are quashed.

Result: Orders quashed and set aside.

JUDGMENT :

Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.

1. Heard the parties.

2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the order dated 26.06.2019 and 06.01.2020 by which respectively, the order of non-bailable warrant of arrest and proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. was issued by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019.

3. The brief fact of the case is that on 26.06.2019, the I.O. of the case filed a petition with a prayer for issue of non-bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioners who are the accused persons of the case involving the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of Indian Penal Code and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella issued non-bailable warrant of arrest without recording its satisfaction that the petitioners are evading arrest.

4. On 06.01.2020, the I.O. of the case filed a petition for issue of proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. inter alia against the petitioners and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella issued the proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. without recording its satisfaction that the petitioners are absconding or concealing themselves to evade their arrest and without fixing the time or place for appearance of the petitioners who are the accused persons of the case.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella has committed illegality by issuing non-bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioners vide order dated 26.06.2019 without recording its satisfaction that the petitioners are evading their arrest. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella passed orders for issue of proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. vide order dated 06.01.2020 without following the due process of law and without recording the satisfaction that the petitioners are absconding or concealing themselves to evade their arrest which is a sine qua non for issuing proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. and without mentioning the time and place for appearance of the petitioners. Hence, it is submitted that orders dated 26.06.2019 and 06.01.2020 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019 be quashed and set aside.

6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the other hand opposes the prayer for quashing the orders dated 26.06.2019 and 06.01.2020 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019 and submits that non-bailable warrant of arrest and the proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. itself shows that there were materials available in the record for the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella to be satisfied that there is justification for issuance of non-bailable warrant of arrest and proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. Hence, it is submitted that this criminal miscellaneous petition being without any merit be dismissed.

7. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials in the record, it is pertinent to mention here that Section 73 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers inter alia the Chief Judicial Magistrate to direct a warrant of arrest to any person within its jurisdiction for arrest of inter alia any person who is accused of non-bailable warrant of arrest and is evading arrest.

8. Now coming to the facts of the case undoubtedly, the petitioners are accused of committing non-bailable offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of Indian Penal Code but there is no material in the record to suggest that they were evading their arrest and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella before issuing the non-bailable warrant of arrest has also not mentioned that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top