S. N. PATHAK
Mayank Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.N. PATHAK, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length.
Prayer
2. The petitioner has approached this Court with a direction upon the respondents, in particular respondent-JPSC, to evaluate his Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) answer sheet of General Studies (Paper-I), which relates to appointment on Class-II posts pursuant to Advertisement No. 01/2025 (Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Competitive Examination, 2023), so that he could appear in the Mains examination which is scheduled to be held from 22.06.2024 onwards, as the petitioner has obtained more marks than the cut off under the unreserved category as per his own calculation based on revised answer key uploaded by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission.
The Facts
3. Briefly stated, Advertisement No. 01/2024 was floated by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission inviting applications for Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Competitive Examination, 2023 from eligible candidates for appointment on Class-II posts. The petitioner being eligible in all respects applied for such appointment. Having found the application form of the petitioner to be in order, admit card was issued to appear on 17.03.2024 for prelimin
Bedanga Talukdar -Vs-Saifudaullah Khan and Ors reported in (2011) 12 SCC 85
Chandra Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Ram Vijay Singh & Ors. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The court established that candidates must strictly adhere to the instructions for filling OMR sheets, as deviations, even if minor, can result in disqualification, thereby maintaining the integrity ....
It cannot be expected that an enquiry be made by the Examining Body as to whose OMR sheet it is when no roll number is written thereon. Such enquiries if burdened on the examination body would entail....
Telangana State Public Service Commission - Power of Judicial review - Scope and Interference - Scope of interference of court in evaluation of answer scripts where candidates have committed errors o....
Strict compliance with examination instructions is mandatory, and deviations cannot be excused to preserve the integrity of public recruitment processes.
The court held that minor errors in bubbling Roll Numbers on OMR sheets should not result in disqualification if candidates are identifiable, emphasizing fairness in evaluation over strict adherence ....
Technical errors in examination forms should not negate candidates' rights to evaluation, especially when merit is established, ensuring equal opportunity in public employment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.