SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 398

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.N. PATHAK, J.
Ram Prakash Ram & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary / Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(S) Nos. 2361, 2394 of 2023
Decided On : 26-06-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Manoj Tandon, Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Mr. Adamya Kerktta, Ms. Ankita.
For the Respondent: Mr. Gaurav Abhishek, AC to AG, Mr. Abhay Prakash.

IMPORTANT POINT
Employees appointed in reserved categories prior to state bifurcation are entitled to claim reservation benefits in the successor state, and arbitrary rejection of their candidatures violates constitutional provisions ensuring equality and non-discrimination.

Headnote:

[RESERVATION] - [Writ Petitions challenging rejection of reserved category candidatures] - [Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000, Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India] - [The court interpreted the provisions of the Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000, particularly Sections 72 and 73, which protect the service conditions and reservation benefits of employees absorbed into the successor state of Jharkhand. The court emphasized that the petitioners, having been appointed in the reserved category prior to the bifurcation of Bihar, were entitled to claim reservation in the limited departmental examination for the post of Deputy Collector. The court found the JPSC's rejection of their candidatures as arbitrary and in violation of constitutional provisions ensuring equality and non-discrimination.]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, Ram Prakash Ram and Hare Ram Singh, challenged the Jharkhand Public Service Commission's (JPSC) decision to reject their candidatures for the Deputy Collector position under reserved categories (BC-I/BC-II) despite their qualifications and prior appointments in the reserved category in the undivided State of Bihar. They argued that their applications were duly certified by their controlling officers, and they had scored higher than the cut-off marks for their respective categories.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that both petitioners were entitled to reservation benefits as they were appointed in the reserved category before the bifurcation of Bihar. The JPSC's action to treat them as unreserved candidates was deemed arbitrary and whimsical, violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The court emphasized that the petitioners had fulfilled all necessary requirements to claim reservation and should be appointed accordingly.

Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to reservation benefits in the limited departmental examination for the post of Deputy Collector despite being appointed in the undivided State of Bihar and whether the JPSC's rejection of their candidatures was arbitrary.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that employees who were appointed in the reserved category prior to the bifurcation of a state are entitled to continue enjoying those benefits in the successor state. The provisions of the Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000, particularly Sections 72 and 73, protect the service conditions and reservation benefits of such employees. The court also reiterated that the limited departmental examination is a promotional opportunity for existing employees, not a direct recruitment process.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the JPSC to recommend the appointment of both petitioners as Deputy Collectors within six weeks and the State to issue appointment letters within four weeks thereafter, with all consequential benefits. If no vacancies were available, supernumerary posts were to be created for their appointments.

JUDGMENT :

S.N. PATHAK, J.

Since the common questions of law and similar facts are involved in both these writ petitions, the same have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Prayers

3. The petitioners have thrown challenge to the authority of the respondents, in particular respondent-Jharkhand Public Service Commission (in short JPSC), whereby the JPSC has declined to accept the candidatures of the petitioners in the reserved category (B.C.-I / B.C.-II) while publishing results. The prayers of the petitioners are that to quash and set aside such decision of the respondent-JPSC and hold and declare that the petitioners are entitled for reservation in the category of B.C.-I/B.C.-II for the post of Deputy Collector pursuant to Advertisement No. 05/2005.

The facts of W.P.(S) No. 2361 of 2023

4. The petitioner Ram Prakash Ram was issued caste certificate dated 24.09.1999 by District Magistrate, Gaya in the undivided State of Bihar, which fully certifies that the petitioner belongs to B.C.-I category. He was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the district of Dumka on 20.05.2000 under the extremely backward class (BC-I) category. The service book was opened and such e-service book mentioned his category as B.C.-I. The JPSC issued Advertisement No. 05/2005 for appointment on the post of Deputy Collector through Limited Departmental Examination. The advertisement stipulates that an employee, who is serving in the State of Jharkhand on a Class-III post for five years, is entitled to apply and participate in the selection process. The petitioner being eligible applied for such appointment on the post of Deputy Collector. The candidature of the petitioner was found to be in order and hence, he was issued admit card, whereby the examination was scheduled to be held on 29.12.2019, but the date was later on shifted to 03.01.2020 by issuing appropriate corrigendum. The petitioner participated in the examination and the result thereof was published by JPSC, as per which, the petitioner obtained 133 marks, but he has been shown ‘not selected’ as his candidature was considered under unreserved category. The cut-off marks was uploaded by the JPSC and as per which, the last selected candidate in BC-I category has scored 125 marks i.e. much less than the petitioner.

The facts of W.P.(S) No. 2394 of 2023

5. The petitioner Hare Ram Singh was issued caste certificate on 16.9.1994 by Sub-Divisional Officer, Jagdishpur in the district of Bhojpur (Bihar), which certifies that he belongs to Backward Category (BC). He was appointed on 07.10.1994 as Assistant Teacher in the district of Hazaribagh in the undivided State of Bihar which now falls within the territorial jurisdiction of Jharkhand. The service book of the petitioner was opened and it has duly been mentioned therein that he belongs to BC category. The existing State of Bihar was bifurcated on 15.11.2000. The Successor State of Jharkhand thereafter issued Advertisement No. 05/2005 for appointment on the post of Deputy Collector through Limited Departmental Examination. Clause 9 of the Advertisement duly stipulates that the candidates who are claiming reservation are required to submit their application form through their Controlling Officer, otherwise the benefit of reservation would not be admissible. The State of Jharkhand issued a Circular contained in Memo No. 3198 dated 18.04.2016 which defines “Local Resident of Jharkhand”. As per this circular, the employee working in the State of Jharkhand or Central Government or his wife or children are entitled for benefit of local resident of Jharkhand. Considering this aspect, the petitioner was issued local resident certificate on 7.2.2017. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Chatra has issued caste certificate also in his favour duly certifying that he belongs to BC-II category on 22.3.2017. The JPSC demanded caste certificate o

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top