SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 989

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Sunil Kumar Ray S/o Late Sachidanand Ray - Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand - Respondent 
W.P. (S) No. 1754 of 2023
Decided On : 24-09-2024


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sumeet Gadodia, Shilpi Sandil Gadodia, Prakhar Harit, Shruti Shekhar
For the Respondents: Sanjay Piprawal, Pinky Tiwari

Denial of Scheduled Caste status based on caste certificate format is unconstitutional under Article 14, violating rights protected by Section 73 of the Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000.

Headnote:(A) Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Section 73 - Rejection of candidature based on inadequate caste certificate format - Action of JPSC deemed illegal as caste recognized both in Bihar and Jharkhand - Caste certificate presented was valid for employment per judicial precedent. (Paras 11, 31-44)

(B) Employment Rights - Equal opportunity under Articles 14 and 16 - Discrimination against the Petitioner by treating him as unreserved, contrary to established rights as a Scheduled Caste employee. (Paras 11, 12, 32)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner, a Scheduled Caste candidate recognized as ‘Dusadh’, was denied his application as Deputy Collector under unreserved category despite securing higher marks than the cut-off due to unrecognized caste certificate, contradicting previous appointments. (Paras 1-10)

Findings of Court:
Court found that the rejection was illegal, mandating JPSC to recommend Petitioner for appointment as Deputy Collector. (Paras 43-44)

Issues: The court addressed whether the caste certificate's format affected the Petitioner’s rights and if the rejection was legally permissible under Section 73 of the Act of 2000. (Paras 10, 35)

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld that employees' rights cannot be diminished by new format requirements, affirming that those already in service retain their status under the law, protecting their reservation benefits. (Paras 31-36)

Result: Writ application allowed, directing JPSC to recommend Petitioner for appointment. (Paras 44)

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks appointment under scheduled caste category. (Para 1)
2. petitioner seeks appointment as deputy collector based on scheduled caste classification. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. petitioner argues rejection of candidature violates articles 14 and 16. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. respondents argue petitioner suppressed material facts in application. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. arguments center on the validity of the caste certificate. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. court notes strict compliance with application instructions is mandatory. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
7. court holds protection under section 73 of the act for scheduled castes. (Para 29 , 32 , 34)
8. court orders recommendation of petitioner for appointment with specified conditions. (Para 44 , 45)

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant writ application has been filed by Petitioner primarily seeking following reliefs:-

(a) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction including Writ of Declaration, declaring that the action of Respondent- Jharkhand Public Service Commissioner [hereinafter referred to as ‘JPSC’ for short] in rejecting the candidature of the Petitioner under the Reserved Category of Scheduled Caste and treating the Petitioner to be a candidate belonging to Un-reserved Category for appointment on the post of Deputy Collector pursuant to Advertisement No. 05/2005 being ‘1st Deputy Collector (Limited) Competitive Examination’ on the alleged sole ground that the Caste Certificate submitted by the Petitioner is not valid is per se, illegal, arbitrary, actuated with malice in law and contrary to the judicial pronouncement of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Pankaj Kumar v. State of Jharkhand & Ors. 2021 SCC OnLine SC 616.

(b) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction including Writ of Mandamus, directing Respondent-JPSC to recommend the name of the Petitioner for appointment on the post of Deputy Collector pursuant to Advertisement No. 05/2005 pertaining to ‘1st Deputy Collector (Limited) Competitive Examination’ on the vacant post of Scheduled Caste Category, especially in view of the fact that the Petitioner has secured more marks than the last selected candidate, including the fact that one Rajendra Kumar Das in whose favour recommendation was made has not joined on the post of Deputy Collector as he was already appointed on the said post pursuant to advertisement conducted by Respondent-JPSC.

(c) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction including Writ of Mandamus, directing Respondent-State of Jharkhand to appoint the Petitioner on the post of Deputy Collector with all consequential benefits, especially in view of the fact that the Petitioner has secured more marks than the last selected candidate under the Scheduled Caste Category pursuant to Advertisement No. 05/2005 pertaining to ‘1st Deputy Collector (Limited) Competitive Examination’ and is entitled for appointment on the post of Deputy Collector.

3. The undisputed facts of the case is that Petitioner belongs to the Caste ‘Dusadh’ which was recognized as a Scheduled Caste under the undivided State of Bihar and after bifurcation of the State of Bihar and creation of the State of Jharkhand with effect from 15.11.2000, the said caste is recognized as Scheduled Caste in both the successor State of Bihar and in the State of Jharkhand. The Petitioner was born in the District of Dhanbad in the year 1973, where his father was working as ‘Peon’ in the office of the District Collectorate at Dhanbad and the Petitioner has obtained his educational qualification i.e. matric examination, intermediate qualification and graduation all from the District of Dhanbad.

4. Pursuant to an advertisement published by Bihar Public Service Commission at the time of undivided State of Bihar, Petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Teacher as Schedule Caste Category and was appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top