SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Chunda Murmu, son of Late Muchiya Murmu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
1. This appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction dated 17.03.2017 and order of sentence dated 18.03.2017, passed by learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-III, Dumka, in Sessions Trial No. 92 of 2012,whereby and whereunder the learned trial court has convicted the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and has sentenced to undergo R.I for life under Section 302 IPC and fine of Rs. 20,000/- and in the event of non-payment of fine convict was further directed to undergo SI for additional three months.
2. This Court, before proceeding to examine the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, deems it fit and proper to refer the background of institution of prosecution case, which as per the written report of the informant Safid Choukidar is that on 29.10.2011, when the informant was going to his house from his duty from State Bank of India, Gando Branch then the villager of Chirudih village informed him that Chunda Murmu has committed murder of his wife. To verifiy this information, he reached near the Chunda Murm
Andhra Pradesh v. Rayavarapu Punnayya
Dhirajbhai Gorakhbhai Nayak vs. State of Gujarat
Jagrup Singh v. State of Haryana
Jai Prakash v. State (Delhi Admn.), Jai Prakash v. State (Delhi Admn.)
Keshub Mahindra v. State of M.P.
Murlidhar Shivram Patekar and Another v. State of Maharashtra
Nankaunoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Pulicherla Nagaraju v. State of A.P.
Sayaji Hanmat Baukar v. State of Maharashtra
Surain Singh v. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.