JUDGMENT :

Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.

1. Heard the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.1 has died hence, he does not press the petition on behalf of petitioner no.1.

3. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is rejected as not pressed so far as the petitioner no.1 is concerned.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners presses this criminal miscellaneous petition on behalf of the petitioner nos.2 to 5 only.

5. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Nirsa P.S. Case No. 249 of 2016, corresponding to G.R. No.3084 of 2016 including the order taking cognizance dated 26.03.2018 by which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under Section 504, 506, 406, 420, 341 and 34 of Indian Penal Code but no witnesses has been examined in this case, so far in the trial court.

6. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner nos.2 to 4 being the directors and petitioner no.5 being the Manager of KRL Infratech (India) Ltd., employed the Hywa vehicle of the informant for five m