Back
SUBHASH CHAND
Govind Yadav S/o Late Somsnath Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH CHAND, J.
1. The instant Criminal Appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction dated 06.12.2017 and order of sentence dated 11.12.2017 passed by the Judicial Commissioner- XVII-cum-FTC (CAW), Ranchi in Sessions Trial No. 355 of 2015 whereby and whereunder the accused Munna Yadav, Govind Yadav and Pankaj Yadav were convicted for the offence under Section 304(B)/34 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 07 years with fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, the appellants have to further undergo S.I. for six months each under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Further the accused persons were sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 05 years each with fine of Rs.3,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, the appellants have to further undergo S.I. for 06 months each under Section 201/34 of the I.P.C. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case leading to the Cr. Appeals are that the written information was given on behalf of the informant Manoj Kumar with the Police Station Sadar Doranda, District- Ranchi with these allegat
The prosecution must prove all elements of dowry death beyond reasonable doubt; mere suspicion is insufficient for conviction.
The prosecution must prove that the victim was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demands soon before her death to establish a case under Section 304B of the IPC; failure to ....
Point of Law : For offence Under Section 304-B Indian Penal Code, punishment is imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life.
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 304-B IPC, establishing that the deceased was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands, leading to her suicide, thus satisfying the legal requirements fo....
The central legal point established is the application of Section 304B of IPC and Section 113-B of the Evidence Act in cases of dowry death, emphasizing the need for proximity between cruelty/harassm....
The prosecution must prove cruelty or harassment for dowry demand soon before death to sustain a conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC; insufficient evidence leads to acquittal.
(1) Cruelty and dowry death – Requirements of proof beyond reasonable doubt in a criminal trial does not stand altered even after introduction of Section 498A or 304B of IPC or 113B in Evidence Act.(....
The court mandated that for a conviction under Section 304-B IPC, the prosecution must demonstrate a proximate link between cruelty and the death, which was found lacking in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
