Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Jahnvi Singh D/o Jeevendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the communication of rejection of the claim for acceptance of their candidature in the preliminary exam test conducted for recruitment to the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division, under the State Judicial Services, notified in terms of advertisement no. 22/2023.
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleading made in the writ petition, required to be enumerated, as under.
3. It is the case of the writ petitioners that the Jharkhand Public Service Commission (in short ‘JPSC’) vide advertisement no. 22 of 2023 dated 14.08.2023, advertised vacancies for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division in the Jharkhand Judicial Service. The JPSC called for applications from desirous and eligible candidates for recruitment to the said post. In pursuant to the advertisement, the petitioners filled their application forms through online application system provided on the website of the commission within the applicable time frame. The petitioners’ candidature was found to be complete with the requirement advertised by the Commission. As such, the petitioners were issued pr
The court upheld the rejection of candidature due to non-compliance with mandatory conditions in the OMR answer sheet, affirming the limited supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 2....
Strict compliance with examination instructions is mandatory, and deviations cannot be excused to preserve the integrity of public recruitment processes.
Trivial errors in examination processes should not lead to disqualification, especially when they do not affect the overall results.
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
Telangana State Public Service Commission - Power of Judicial review - Scope and Interference - Scope of interference of court in evaluation of answer scripts where candidates have committed errors o....
It cannot be expected that an enquiry be made by the Examining Body as to whose OMR sheet it is when no roll number is written thereon. Such enquiries if burdened on the examination body would entail....
Tampering with an OMR answer sheet invalidates a candidate's application; expiration of select panels limits appointment validity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
