IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Rukmani Kumari W/o Abhishek Kumar Saha – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
W.P. (S) No. 4508 of 2024
Decided On : 13-08-2024
(A) Writ Jurisdiction - Directions for counseling process - The petitioner sought accommodation in the counseling process for Assistant Teacher posts based on previous court orders. The court directed the State to initiate counseling for eligible candidates who scored higher than the last selected candidates, ensuring compliance with relevant rules and timelines. (Paras 3, 4, 7, 8)
(B) Judicial Precedent - The court reaffirmed the principle of following previous judgments in similar cases, ensuring that eligible candidates are not deprived of their rights based on prior decisions. (Paras 4, 5, 6)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for Assistant Teacher vacancies in 2015 and claimed eligibility based on higher marks than selected candidates. Previous judgments directed the State to initiate counseling for similarly situated candidates.
Findings of Court:
The court directed the State to verify the eligibility of the petitioner in light of previous judgments and ensure compliance with the counseling process.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner is entitled to similar benefits as those granted in previous cases based on eligibility criteria.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the State to comply with previous orders and ensure fair treatment of eligible candidates in the counseling process.
Result: Writ petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to accommodate the petitioner in the counselling process to be conducted for the post of Assistant Teacher in the light of order passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P. (S) No. 2378 of 2019 and other analogous matters as well as in L.P.A. No. 203 of 2022 and other analogous matter for which she has applied for consideration of her candidatures under Non-Para categories for the remaining vacancies of Inter Trained Teachers (Class VI-VIII) and if the petitioner is found eligible then she may be given appointment as she has already applied against the vacancies in the year 2015 and the candidates having lesser marks than the petitioner has been called and allowed to participate in the counselling.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the similar issue fell for consideration before this Court in W.P. (S) No. 2378 of 2019 (Paras Nath Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other analogous cases and this Court after hearing the parties vide its judgment delivered on 16.02.2022, allowed the said writ petitions with the following directions:
4. Thereafter, the respondent-State challenged the said order before the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 203 of 2022 and the Division Bench of this Court dismissed the LPA preferred by the respondent-State.
The relevant Para of the said judgment reads as under:
(I) Initiate the process of counseling forthwith for the present petitioners by way of last opportunity as it is alleged they have obtained more marks than the last selected candidates in the merit list in the respective districts.
(II) The petitioners shall approach the Deputy Commissioners of the concerned Districts, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(III) However, in the meantime, the Deputy Commissioner of the concerned district shall give proper notice to the petitioners by way of Press Communique, advertising the notice in the local newspaper having the wide circulation in the concerned Districts and also by putting the notice on the Notice Board of the Office of concerned District Superintendent of Education.
(IV) This Court hopes and trusts that the entire process of counseling will be completed within a period of further eight weeks subjec
Judicial precedents must be followed to ensure fair treatment in selection processes based on merit, as established in prior cases.
The court emphasized the necessity for compliance with prior judicial orders in the counseling process for Assistant Teachers, prioritizing merit and eligibility of candidates.
The court emphasized adherence to judicial precedents, directing authorities to accommodate eligible candidates in the counseling process based on merit, ensuring fair treatment and timely compliance....
The court mandated that candidates with higher marks must be allowed to participate in the counseling process, reinforcing principles of fairness and compliance with previous judgments.
The court mandated the state to comply with prior orders for counseling of eligible teachers, emphasizing timely completion and adherence to selection criteria.
The court directed the initiation of counseling for eligible candidates based on merit, emphasizing compliance with prior judicial orders.
Para teachers scoring higher than non-para candidates are entitled to participate in counseling for Assistant Teacher positions, as affirmed by prior judicial orders.
The court mandates compliance with prior orders for teacher counseling, emphasizing merit-based inclusion of eligible candidates.
The court ruled that exclusion from the merit list despite higher scores constitutes arbitrariness, necessitating compliance with prior judicial directions for fair counselling.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that candidates who have secured more marks than the last selected candidates are entitled to be considered for counseling and appointment, especia....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.