Back
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Neelam Kumari W/o Nishish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing and setting aside the letter dated 18.11.2022 issued by respondent no. 3; whereby the services of the petitioner have been terminated.
2. The petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the respondents to reinstate the petitioner forthwith.
3. The brief fact of the case is that the respondent-authorities have issued advertisement inviting application for appointment on the post of Full Time Science Teacher in Kasturba Gandhi Residential Girl’s School on 22.06.2006. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an application and vide letter dated 08.10.2006, the petitioner was appointed as a Teacher in the subject of Science in Kasturba Gandhi Residential Girl’s School, Satbarwa and an agreement was executed between the petitioner and the respondents with certain terms and conditions. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner gave her joining. On 09.06.2020, the petitioner was also given an additional charge of Warden (Principal) of the school.
In contemplation to some complaint on 05.11.2022, the respondents issued first show-cause notice to the petitioner vide Annexure-5 to which the petiti
Termination without a proper inquiry is illegal and stigmatic, necessitating reinstatement and adherence to principles of natural justice.
Termination orders with allegations of misconduct require a formal inquiry and adherence to natural justice, even for contractual employees.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
