SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Sunil Tudu, s/o late Lakshman Tudu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shree Chandrashekhar, A.C.J.
The petitioners are aggrieved by the framing of the “Jharkhand Rajya Police Appointment Rules, 2014” [“Jharkhand Rajya Police Appointment Rules, 2014” shall be referred to as ‘the Recruitment Rules of 2014’] superseding the provisions under the Jharkhand Police Manual for the selection and appointment of the Police Constables.
2. The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are Home Guards, who can be broadly divided under three categories viz. (a) those who did not qualify for the Mains examination (b) those who were called for the Medical and Fitness tests and (c) those who are seeking age-relaxation. All of them have questioned the power of the State of Jharkhand and the legal foundation for framing the Recruitment Rules of 2014 on the ground that the Jharkhand Police Manual occupies the field of the appointment and selection of the Constables. A large number of the petitioners participated in the last recruitment exercises but could not make it to the final selection list and now they seek to challenge the appointment of the Constables on the ground that the recruitment exercises in the past were conducted in breach of the statutory provi
A.B. Krishna v. State of Karnataka
Ajay Kumar Bhuyan v. State of Orissa
Ami Lal Bhat (Dr) v. State of Rajasthan
D.R. Yadav v. R.K. Singh: (2003) 7 SCC 110
Desh Bandhu Gupta & Co. v. Delhi Stock Exchange Assn. Ltd.
Govt. of A.P. v. N. Subbarayudu
Hathising Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Madan Lal v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Malik Mazhar Sultan v. U.P. Public Service Commission
Manak Lal v. Prem Chand Singhvi
Nair Service Society v. State of Kerala
Raichurmatham Prabhakar v. Rawatmal Dugar
State of Bihar v. Ramjee Prasad
Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan
The Jharkhand Rajya Police Appointment Rules, 2014 are valid and do not violate constitutional provisions, affirming the employer's authority to set recruitment criteria.
Point of Law : Service Law - Appointment of Sub Inspectors - Selection Process - There is no provision in Rules of 2015 to even remotely suggest that method of recruitment would even apply to those c....
Post of Police constable – Direct recruitment - To lower respective category-wise merit and accord selection to them on the vacant posts of Constable (Civil Police/PAC) – Held, Such situation eventua....
The authority of the Commission to modulate the method of recruitment within the powers granted by the Act and Rules.
The Government has power to grant relaxation in upper age limit on its own motion or upon getting intimation from any genuine or bona fide source can grant such relaxation subject to the condition th....
Eligibility criteria for Ex-servicemen in recruitment must align with statutory rules; arbitrary conditions imposed by executive instructions are unlawful.
Rule 19.14 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934, which provides for the selection of Constables for the Lower School Course on the basis of a competitive test, is not violative of Article 16 of the Const....
(1) Appointment – Even if relevant rules permit competent authority to set benchmarks at different stages of recruitment process, same must be done at any time before relevant stage is reached.(2) Ap....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.