SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 595

S. N. PATHAK
Kishun Gope – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. L.K. Passi, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-I

JUDGMENT :

S. N. Pathak, J.

Heard the parties.

2. Petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the order dated 10.11.2014, passed by the Commissioner, Ranchi in Appeal under Rule 4 of the Bihar and Orissa Subordinate Services (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1935 against the order dated 08.01.2014, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Simdega.

Further prayer has been made to quash and set aside the order dated 08.01.2014, passed by Deputy Commissioner, Simdega, communicated to the petitioner on 16.01.2014 vide Memo No. 13, dated 11.01.2014, dismissing the petitioner from service under Rule 19 of the Jharkhand Panchayat Secretary (Appointment, Service Condition and Duty), Rules, 2002 Rule 2 (VIII) of Bihar & Orissa Subordinate Officer (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1935 and Rule 165 of the Bihar/Jharkhand Board Miscellaneous Rules, on the basis of Enquiry Report of Gandur Bhagat, Project Officer, Meso Area, Simdega in departmental Enquiry No. 01 of 2009.

3. The fact of the case in brief is that petitioner was working as a Panchayat Sewak under Kurdeg Block, Simdega and had to follow the instructions of the concerned Block Development Officer. Pursuant to memo no. 63(ii

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top