SUBHASH CHAND
Tribikram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Most. Garibala Debi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhash Chand, J.
1. The instant First Appeal has been directed against the Judgment dated 04.09.2018 and decree dated 18.09.2018 whereby the suit of plaintiff for the specific performance has been dismissed and allowed the alternate relief for refund of the earnest money along with interest.
2. The brief facts leading to this First Appeal are that the plaintiff had instituted a suit with these averments that the plaintiff is the permanent resident of Seraikella town having his house and other landed properties, and the landed property situated in mouza Kudarsai, Thana No. 302, Khata No. 18 belonged to and stood recorded in the name of late Kalipada Daroga who was the father of principal defendant No. 1 and after his death the property was amicably divided between the principal defendant no. 1 and his brothers in which the lands described in the schedule of the plaint fell in share of the principal defendant which is situated in the jurisdiction of this Court. The principal defendant proposed to sell the suit land to plaintiff in consideration of Rs. 30,60,000/- to which plaintiff agreed and consequently an agreement to sale was executed between plaintiff and defendant No.
The plaintiff's failure to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform the contract led to the dismissal of the appeal for specific performance.
A plaintiff seeking specific performance must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform their contractual obligations; failure to do so bars relief.
The plaintiff must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform a contract for specific performance; mere possession or improvements do not suffice.
Plaintiff's failure to prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform contract negates entitlement to specific performance under Specific Relief Act.
Continuous readiness and willingness on the part of the plaintiff is a condition precedent for obtaining relief of grant of specific performance, as mandated by Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief A....
Time is of the essence in specific performance agreements; the plaintiff must prove readiness and willingness to execute the contract, which was not established in this case.
In specific performance cases, the plaintiff must continuously demonstrate financial capacity and willingness to perform contractual obligations for relief, requiring substantial evidence rather than....
The plaintiff must prove readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations for specific performance; failure to do so results in dismissal of the suit.
The court affirmed that a party seeking specific performance must demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform their contractual obligations, substantiated by evidence.
The obligation to clear a mortgage lies with the seller, and the buyer's readiness to perform arises only after the seller fulfills this condition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.