Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY PRASAD, J.
Sanjeet Soni @ Sanjeet Kumar Soni – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Prasad, J.
This Criminal Revision has been filed on behalf of the juvenile petitioner challenging the judgment dated 14.12.2023, passed by Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned Special Judge, Child Act Cases-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chatra in Criminal (Juvenile) Appeal No. 29 of 2023, by which Appeal has been dismissed by rejecting the prayer for bail of the juvenile-petitioner and the Appellate Court has affirmed the Order dated 22.08.2023, passed by the Principal Magistrate and Members of the Juvenile Justice Board, Chatra in Miscellaneous Criminal Appl. No. 2572 of 2023, by which prayer of bail of the petitioner was rejected in connection with Rajpur P.S.Case No. 25 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Section 302 , 201, 120(B), 34 of I.P.C.
2. Heard Mr. B.K. Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Shweta Singh, learned A.P.P. on behalf of the State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the judgment and order passed by the learned Appellate Court below and the Principal Magistrate and Members of the Juvenile Justice Board, Chatra are illegal, arbitrary and not sustainable in the eye of law. It is submitted that the juvenile pet
The court affirmed that substantial evidence, including confessions and witness testimonies, justified the denial of bail for a juvenile accused of murder, emphasizing the importance of maintaining i....
The court emphasized the importance of a juvenile's social investigation report and the duration of custody in bail decisions, granting bail based on the absence of adverse findings.
Bail for juveniles in serious offenses requires exceptional circumstances; mere similarity to other cases is insufficient for discharge.
Juveniles accused of serious crimes are entitled to favorable consideration for bail under the Juvenile Justice Act, reflecting their minor status and the necessity for a lenient approach.
A juvenile-petitioner should be granted bail when a co-accused is similarly granted bail, unless exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise.
Bail to juveniles under JJ Act Section 12 is rule; denial only on three specific grounds, not offence seriousness or age, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
Juvenile bail applications must consider potential dangers and previous criminal associations, emphasizing protection against harm.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of bail for juveniles in conflict with the law, the requirement for reasonable grounds to deny bail, and the emphasis on the b....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
